(By Titti Santamato)
(ANSA) - ROME, OCT 12 - The need to accompany the progress of
technologies such as artificial intelligence with
anthropocentric solutions, which put the person at the centre,
and respect for the Constitution was among the conclusions of
the three-day G7
Privacy meeting in Rome.
The Personal Data Protection Authorities of Italy, Canada,
France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and United States
held discussions at the meeting and approved seven documents.
"We tried to reach agreement on the goals and methods to adopt
in this phase of society's evolution with countries with
different systems," explained Pasquale
Stanzione, the President of the Italian Personal Data Protection
Authority, and Vice President Ginevra Cerrina Feroni, as they
illustrated the final declaration.
The G7 Privacy did not just address the issue of emerging
technologies like artificial intelligence, it also focused on
the free circulation of data and the protection of minors.
With regards to the latter point, Stanzione observed: "we all
found each other
in agreement that we need to develop an adequate digital
pedagogy that convinces and, above all, encourages minors to use
computers and smartphones consciously.
"We must make them aware that making statements on these devices
means having them spread on the Web and the is no right to be
forgotten or de-indexing that can erase this element," he
continued.
"The true reality is that of relationships. The reality if of
Alexa, Siri and the metaverse is not true reality".
Cerrina Feron stressed that "we are in the middle of a digital
transition
covering all sectors of public administration, from healthcare
to education.
"Accompanying all sectors with continuous dialogue is a complex
process because the digital transition affects all the rights
and duties of citizens," she continued.
As regards intelligence artificial, a central issue of the G7
Privacy and now of our
daily lives, the vice president of the personal data protection
authority emphasized that technology must be "an amplifier of
rights and freedoms and not a source of new injustices,
inequalities and excessive concentrations of public or private
power.
"The word that has been mentioned most over the last few days is
'trustworthy' AI. We found a very broad agreement on this," she
concluded.
Stanzione then spoke about the issue of data protection in the
IoT, the Internet of Things, i.e. objects that we have at home
like the TV or the fridge; and of the need for "maximum caution"
in video surveillance, in the dissemination of biometric data
and in predictive justice too "because the boundary between the
need
for security and respect for the human person is extremely
fine".
When talking about the difficult balance between innovation and
the evolution of AI, Stanzione underlined that there is "no
opposition to progress" saying it "will probably be necessary to
make the specific legislation a little more flexible" while
"keeping in mind the rigor of the Constitution".
Stanzione and Cerrina Feroni concluded that: "in this great new
frontier of artificial intelligence, it is necessary to
recognize the role, the acquired skills and
the independence that the privacy authorities will have to have
in AI governance, regardless of political decisions. We hope
that policy makers will be able to take in this valuable
information". (ANSA).
The person, Constitution must be at centre of AI says Privacy G7
Authorities 'important for governance, convergence'